I often ask myself "What is a South African?" & despite growing up among diverse groups, I never identified with them & ultimately identified with black people who were like me i. e. listened to kwaito & liked soccer. As I grew older & got exposed to the world more, I identified with black people overseas like R'n'B musicians, rappers & black NBA players that we saw on the media. Who is South African to me remains the black guy on the streets of our townships not rugby playes & Olympic swimmers. This is who the "phenotype" of South Africa is to me, the guys we all know & grew up knowing. I know others identify as South African but they're simply an insignificant minority in my world as a black South African & that is a good thing to me, I feel homogeneous societies work best.
I've heard some people quoting from King Shaka's praises claiming that he was "like the sun" therefore light-skinned. But I'd like to ask how comparisons with the sun equate with being light-skinned? If anything, if King Shaka was light-skinned, they'd compare him to something terrestrial like the colour of a cow hide, wood or other object because very few extraterrestrial objects have the colour of any human skin. Even white people are called "ondlebe zikhanya ilanga" ('those who have translucent ears") & not "abakhanya okwelanga" ("those who shine like the sun"). King Shaka's mother was from Elangeni & there is the Langa clan in KZN, all of them are black with many being exceptionally dark-skinned so I don't think the comparisons comparing King Shaka with the sun have anything to do with his complexion. Even the whites who first saw him & drew him wrote that he was dark & fairly tall. I also don...
Comments