Skip to main content

Homogeneity.

My first encounter of the concept of homogeneity came when I read how some Italian football dignitary of sorts commented on when they beat a team that was a combination of every nation in the world (the French national football team) with just Italians at the 2006 FIFA World Cup. This Italian football boss then went on to mention the various Italian tribes (Campanians, Etruscans, Sicilians, Lombards etc.). I, in fact, kept that Kick Off magazine where it was reported he said what he said - it has Ronaldinho in a red jacket on it's cover - but seem to have misplaced it somewhere. I didn't think of it much at first because I simply thought this Italian man was just running his mouth, but I've had this concept of homogeneity at the back of my mind for a long time. After hearing this, you then compare which football teams do better, is it black teams, Arab teams, mixed-race teams... simply, football is a European sport so Europe should be better at it. So it's not an accurate measure of the successes & failures of race. Football just seems like an accurate measure of a land's success because of the sport's popularity. 

Brazil is a multiracial country & they consider themselves a nation despite having indigenous tribes - who don't know Brazil exists - living in its' Amazon jungle. They are the best at football but not the best socially or economically. Crime & poverty is rampant in Brazil despite recent developments. So football is not an accurate measure of a land's success. What then determines a land's success? Financial wealth, health, food security... these are more important measures at determining a country's success. And, by chance, most lands that are most financially secure, have a low mortality rate & are healthier are usually homogenous lands [e. g. Norway, Sweden, Japan, South Korea, Botswana, Morocco, Libya (under Gaddafi), Netherlands, Poland etc.] Sure, you could say that most of these are "white" countries hence their financial success. But that's only because the current global economic system favours Western countries. Countries like Zambia & Mali could argue that they are financially stable due to low debt & a certain amount of food security (i. e. citizens are not struggling to survive) but in guages used to measure countries by their success or failures, we often only see the best, worst & our own countries. Where the best are often these Western (European) homogenous countries. 

We could ask "Why can't homogenous African countries emulate the same success?" Personally, I think they do but on a smaller scale due to lack of capital. This success can often look negligible compared to multiracial countries who have larger capital due to being favoured by previous colonial empires, which gives this illusion of failure among homogenous black countries. 


So is homogeneity or multiculturalism better for a society? Well, in a globalised world where often the default & norm is multiculturalism because of colonisation in the 1700s & 1800s, many approve of multicultural & multiracial (heterogeneous) societies but after a while this heterogenous society descends into a self-loathing / self-destructive state if it continues it's unity. I mentioned this Babylon phenomenon in a previous blog. But in a world that loves multiculturalism, I'd like to offer another way of thought & claim there is beauty, purpose, stability & function in unicultural & homogenous lands. 

P.S. Multicultural & multiracial lands still hold much value in the global landscape & should be valued.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The problem with a single African currency.

Preword: It's funny because one of the main reasons I found the courage to blog on African matters was due to a West African(?) gentleman who proposed the concept of a said "swal" & "zul" as a continental African currency in a blog. His boldness & conviction in his idea just captivated me & today I have to debunk this idea of his. But, hopefully, Africa sees why. African technologies & financial solutions Oh, Africa. We are so romantic; "United States of Africa", "Single African currency", "African unity", "Ubuntu"... all these fluffy, lovey-dovey concepts that will be ripped to shreds in the globalised world.  I debunked why a United States of Africa would likely collapse as soon as it sees the light of day. Today, I will debunk the concept of a "Single African currency" & explain why it would leave our enemies salivating.  I can't blame people who like stuff like United States of Africa...

A viable single African currency concept.

The original reason why I believe a single African currency would not work. Below is how we could attempt to make it work.  The many currencies of Africa. To prevent destabilization of the continent's economy, there could be two currencies: The Lami  for countries lying mostly north of the equator & the Ng'ombe  for countries mostly south of the equator. Both currencies would be independent with the Lami having it's bank & headquarters in Addis Ababa while the Ng'ombe could have it's bank & headquarters in Nairobi.  N.B.: Gabon, Congo-Brazzaville, DRC & Kenya would use the Ng'ombe currency while Uganda & Somalia would use the Lami currency.  North of equator = Lami  South of equator = Ng'ombe   More stable countries with higher GDP per capita could be first to use the new currencies i.e. Seychelles, Mauritius, Gabon, Botswana, Libya, Equatorial Guinea, South Africa, Algeria, Na...

What did King Shaka look like?

I've heard some people quoting from King Shaka's praises claiming that he was "like the sun" therefore light-skinned. But I'd like to ask how comparisons with the sun equate with being light-skinned? If anything, if King Shaka was light-skinned, they'd compare him to something terrestrial like the colour of a cow hide, wood or other object because very few extraterrestrial objects have the colour of any human skin. Even white people are called "ondlebe zikhanya ilanga" ('those who have translucent ears") & not  "abakhanya okwelanga" ("those who shine like the sun"). King Shaka's mother was from Elangeni & there is the Langa clan in KZN, all of them are black with many being exceptionally dark-skinned so I don't think the comparisons comparing King Shaka with the sun have anything to do with his complexion. Even the whites who first saw him & drew him wrote that he was dark & fairly tall. I also don...